Museums, today and tomorrow ? Definitions, missions, ethics
About the meeting
The Extraordinary General Assembly of the International Council of Museums (ICOM) hold in Kyoto on September 7 decided to postpone its vote around the "new definition of the museum”, which had led to intense debates that were widely reported in the international press.
To be described in a few words and inspired by a rather critical vision of some 20th century museums - especially Western ones - the "new" definition proposed to shift the centre of gravity of museums: from institutions conserving collections and dedicated to the transmission to the public of their artistic, historical, scientific and natural heritage, the museum became a multi-purpose institution, serving human rights as a whole. A proposal breaking away from the definition that had hitherto appeared in ICOM's statutes as well as the regulatory texts of many member countries, distancing itself from the professional anchoring of the organization, and which caused a postponement of discussion.
A large majority of the members realized that beyond the words they were discovering, it was their common vision of the museums of tomorrow, their missions and their own ethics that were being called into question.
Among the 4,000 present representatives of ICOM's national and international committees out of the 44,000 that the organization has in 135 countries, many left with a sense of urgency to redefine, not so much the word "museum", but what links museums together and their perspectives for a shared future: "definition" is an operational tool, not a parable; as a tool, it must be simple and consensual, and obviously free of misunderstandings, unclear terms or gaps. Managing to define what brings museums together in a common project is another challenge, a decisive one for a world organization that represents them: what makes a museum singular today and distinguishes it from other "polyphonic and inclusive" places, such as those being created every day in all regions of the world (cultural centres, performance halls, etc.)? In what way the "collections" and the specific work they require, are precisely what makes the meaning of museums and the strength of the social bond they create? What new skills and qualifications are today the basis for professional excellence that guarantees the public's trust in museums to transmit their history? What updating of the code of ethics, the common culture of museum professionals, is made necessary by these changes at work?
Since Kyoto, these questions have taken place, sometimes intensely, within the many committees of ICOM and even beyond, with other professional museum organizations and among cultural actors, journalists, associations, public officials...
It is the fruit of this work that ICOM France intends to collect, in March, in Paris. Of course, it will express different and even divergent convictions and proposals. Among the 135 member countries of ICOM, there are so many different cultural models! It is not about trying to harmonize. It is about moving in the same direction and carrying values that bring people together. This is what has united ICOM for over 70 years, and allows professionals, whatever their position in their organization and the position of their organization in their country, to dialogue and to practice their profession.
The working day was devoted to giving the floor to the representatives of the national and international committees and the alliances who have led discussions with their members over the past six months: expressed positions, expectations and proposals for the future. Round tables compared the approaches and restart the prospective approach.
Bruno David, Chair, Musée national d’histoire naturelle
Regine Schulz, Chair, Advisory Council of ICOM
Juliette Raoul-Duval, Chair, ICOM France
François Mairesse, Professor, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle
ICOM Germany, ICOM Austria, ICOM Azerbaïdjan, ICOM Bangladesh, ICOM Belgium, ICOM Burkina Faso, ICOM Croatia, ICOM Equateur, ICOM Spain, ICOM Estonia, ICOM France, ICOM Georgia, ICOM Greece, ICOM Ireland, ICOM Israel, ICOM Italy, ICOM Latvia, ICOM Luxembourg, ICOM Netherlands, ICOM Poland, ICOM Portugal, ICOM Slovakia, ICOM Switzerland, ICOM Turkey, ICOM Ukraine, AVICOM, CECA, CIDOC, CIMUSET, CIMCIM, COSTUME, DEMHIST, GLASS, ICMAH, ICMEMO, ICOFOM, ICR, INTERCOM, MPR.
Synthesis by Florence Le Corre, conservator
Chaired by Marie-Laure Estignard, Director, musée des Arts et Métiers
Marie Cornu, Jurist and Research Director, CNRS / or her representative
Jean-Louis Chiss, Professor, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle
Participants: Daniele Jalla (ICOM Italy) ; Ech-Cherki Dahmali (ICOM Marocco / ICOM Arab) via Skype ; Arja van Veldhuizen (ICOM Netherlands) ; Marie-Clarté O’Neill (CECA) ; Philippe Büttner (ICOM Switzerland) ; Markus Walz (ICOM Germany)
Reporting of ICOFOM survey results
Marion Bertin, ICOFOM Secretary
Markus Walz, ICOM Germany & Juliette Raoul-Duval, ICOM France